1. Cal. Penial Code 839.1.a (1`) Officer in this case was outside his political Subdivision/Territorial Jurisdiction that employ the peace officer.
2. People V. Landis 2007 – 68 Cal. Rep. 3d 367 – 268
a) When the Authority of an officer to arrest falls outside his or her powers to arrest, when acting beyond his or her geographic area his or her authority is the same as that is conferred upon a private citizen.
b) The citation issued to the defendant for failure to stop at a red light outside the officers Territorial Jurisdiction was not proper as a citizen arrest, because defendant was not taken to magistrate or to other police officer as required by law.
Facts Are as Followers: Defendant for several months have observed Employees of the City of Los Angeles; who are assigned to the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD), Conducting daily unlawfully, law enforcement operations; in the Los Angels County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) Train facility. Defendant knew they were city workers and they were assigned to the LAPD based on the uniform they wore.
One of the two points these operations are carried out are at: Union Station. The operation at Union Station, targeting riders of the: A line. The A line Travels back and Forth from City of Azusa to Down Town Long Beach.
The second and last location these operations are carried out is at Persian Square Subway Train Station. The Operations at Persian Square Subway Train Station target riders on the B and the D lines which travels back and forth from Union Station to North Hollywood in the case of the B line and from Union Station to Wilshire and Western in Korea Town in case of the D line.
The main target, of these operations, are the members of the disenfranchised African American community.
On Sunday, December 29th, 2024, at about 10:00 A.M. while the defendant was using the Metro B line, heading South. Upon arrival and stopping at Persian Square Train Station, he noticed the LAPD employees, dressed in uniform, carrying out one of their unlawful operations, at the Persian Square Subway Train Station. The LAPD personnel activated the train’s emergency system, to hold the train in the station while they conducted their checks. The cart defendant Palmer was in was not checked.
As a result, defendant Palmer, continued to the next stop and awaited the next train going North. positioned himself on the train, where he will come into contact with the officers that were conducting the operations. Upon reaching the Persian Square Train Stop in the subway; the officers activated the train emergency door system, then they asked passengers, to show them their metro card.
It is important to note; that the officers at this point, did not have any apparatus to verify the validity that the people who were riding actually paid their fare.
When the officer came to defendant Palmer, Defendant brought it to the officer’s attention, they do not have any lawful authority, to make any law enforcement demand upon him. Palmer also told the officers, he is not showing him anything; and he will not be cooperating with him in this regard; because he do not have a lawful authority, to make any demands with him. The officer insisted they have, the rights to act in the manner they were acting.
Officers invited Defendant Palmer to step off of the train, the request to which defendant Palmer refused.
The officer them called for back up on the police Radio. As a result, several other NYPD personnel came to the officer’s assistance. The of the LAPD personnel took away defendant Palmer’s liberty. They carried out a search of defendant Palmer’s person, put him in hand cuffs, took him to street level, placed him in a LAPD vehicle and transported me to the Los Angeles Police Department Holding; where he was processed.
It must be noted that there were three Supervisors of the rank of Sergeant of Police that was on the scene overseeing the operation
Defendant Palmer property was search: violating his privacy. The search of defendant Palmer’s property his California ID was retrieved, from his property. It was only then that the police officers learnt of defendant Palmer’s identity which facilitated him being booked in (photos, fingerprints, and a jail identification tag was place on his hand. The L.A.P.D. employees attempted to have defendant Palmer evaluated by the facility medical personnel, which defendant Palmer refused).
The defendant was later placed in a cell for several hours after which he was granted bail to appear before a magistrate.
The California Penial code, which the Los Angeles Police Department personnel are sworn to enforce; Clearly set out the perimeters for the institution like the LAPD to
operate. Sec. 830.1.a (1) restricts the Los Angeles Police Department personnel from operating outside their territorial Jurisdiction, which not only entails those areas outside the city limits. But also entails, those streets, buildings, parks, and other properties and facilities that are own by a sovereign that is within the city limits of the city of Los Angeles. Which will include County, State and Federal, buildings, parks, properties and other facilities.
According to Sec. 830.1.a. (3) of the California Penal Code, the only reason Los Angeles Police Department personnel has the authority to act, outside their territorial Jurisdiction/Political Subdivision; is in the case they witnessed, a public offence, or have probable cause to believe, a Public Offence was committed, with respect to which there is immediate danger, to person or property, or of the escape of the perpetrator of the offence.
No Police officer could ever complete his or her basic Police Training Course without being thought operational Jurisdiction; what it is and how it works and how such limitations can impact actual policing.
The unlawful actions of the Los Angeles Police Department employees, resulted in the violation of Several of the defendant’s protected rights. Which includes article 1 of the California constitution sec. 13, which protects Defendant Palmer’s rights from unlawful/unreasonable search and seizure.
The entire process of booking defendant Palmer into the jail was unlawful process, and was in violation of Defendant Palmer’s constitution rights as it protected by the California constitution and the constitution of the United States of America.
Defendant in this case request that this court dismiss this case, to delay the dismissal of this case is to deny the defendant justice; and to compound the injuries the unlawful acts of the LAPD personnel have so unlawfully inflicted upon the defendant in this case.
In closing: These Rogue employees of the Los Angeles Police Department. Do not care about the rule of law; and it is evident that the oath they took, to uphold the law of California and the laws of the United States of America, to the best of their ability without fear and or favor means absolutely nothing to them.
They are nothing but mercenaries for hire, and as such they are willing to violate the rights of the citizenry, to get and continue to get, the extra duty monies from the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Authority.
A Perfect example of this is this case, here we have one incident that took place on Sunday 29th December 2024, and from that one incident defendant Palmer was alleged to committed three minor infractions, Yet the defendant is give three different court dates, to attend two different courts.
In my fourteen years of policing and actively policing in two sovereign jurisdictions, I have never, seen or hear of anything like this. This is nothing but a demonstration of greed. A willful perpetration of fraudulent, to obtain three days of extra duty pay from the Los Angeles Metro. To attend court to deal with a matter that should have been dealt with on one day in one court. This is the extent of the dishonesty of these LAPD employees.
Dated this 22nd day of January, 2025
Allan H. F. Palmer
Defendant in Pro Per
No comments:
Post a Comment